.................. 
THIS STAGGERING 
PORTRAIT FROM  
THE OFFICIAL (!!!!!) 
ROYAL HOMEPAGE
 
Member of Canada HyperBanner
Member of Canada HyperBanner

Pearls of 
wisdom 
in reply 

. 
. 



VISIT THE CASINO,


HELP DIMINISH THE DEBT!!!!!!




James.T.Ramsay@BTInternet.com 
 
You're a student, I presume. (No actually, I am a 41 year old computer 
professional) 
CND  (?????? some regional thing????)  not popular anymore 
so...well...um...oh yes! Attack the monarchy! Wow, its nice for some people 
to find a little campaign issue and fail to carry out any research on it. Among 
the site's failures are:
A failure to mention how many people believe in the monarchical system - 78%
at the last Gallup poll  (......BIG DEAL......WHO CARES......MOST PEOPLE 
THOUGHT THE EARTH WAS FLAT ONCE TOO)
The fact that the restoration of Windsor Castle did not cost the tax payer a
penny. THIS ASSERTION IS SIMPLY PLAIN WRONG! (Fair enough....have
amended it to "WANTED YOU TO PAY FOR THE REPAIRS AND HAD 
TO BE PRESSGANGED INTO COUGHING UP")
The Queen is the tenth richest woman in England, so you make her out to be a
lot richer than she actually is. I presume you are an Australian (SHOCK HORROR!!) - only a site with such a vacuum of intelligenceand measured argument could be made by an Australian Republican.  (I'll be sure to pass that along to them.....you xenophobic twit)
You fail to understand the Privvy (?) system - some of the job titles you
describe are government posts which are carried out by someone elected to
parliament (well why are they listed on the official royal site as part of the royal
workforce...or are we all just part of it anyway since we are all "subjects" ?)
What is wrong with having lots of employees? Great Britain is hardly going
to model its international status on Estonia. (You impugn Estonia?..I must 
post a news group on that) These employees help her to carry out OFFICIAL
DUTIES for which she must work hard. (oh..just like factory workers and
miners is that, minus the royal yachts etc) A monarch has a job
to do like any other head of state - hereditary or elected. If we had a
president he would do exactly the same job. So it is no good devaluing the
idea of a head of state - the whole population of the world would disagree
with you.(snicker....step outside the UK mate)
You don't present us with an alternative - which is very strange indeed. You
just protest like a little child "royalty sucks!!!" and that's it. How
weird. Perhaps President Thatcher would have been a more palatable
alternative? (any Thatcher apart from Margaret would have been fine, but 
President Thatcher is indeed preferable, vile though her occupation of 
number 10 was for the majority of the downtrodden English)
The vast sums of money taxpayers spend amount to £40,000,000 per year, and
if you live in Australia its virtually nothing. Wow, $40 M. That's about the
price of a Mars Bar per subject of the UK per year. Oh what I would do with
my 60p per year - it would be put to so much use. Yeah, right.(Yeah right give me
my Mars Bar...it's rightfully mine)
I don't suppose you know much about the Civil List, (why not?) but let me tell
you - you might learn something for once. At the time of King George III the 
Civil List was established to grow closer links between Crown and Government.
The Crown would give up the profit it made from the Estate it owned (Duchy of
Lancaster, five acres of central London, etc.) in reciprocation for the Civil List.
The Crown Estate revenue goes direct to the Treasury. This amounted to 
£96,000,000 last year. So in fact, the monarchy gives "the people" £96M less
the £40M it takes back, which is very unfair as I'm sure you agree. That is why
I personally support the privatisation of the Monarchy where they reject the Civil 
List and are allowed to take the profit from THEIR OWN land. (did you forget 
how they originally acquired the wherewithal to generate this enormous amount 
of revenue???) That way they get more money and can lead even more extravagant
lifestyles. They could even build a new Royal Yacht with the extra money! (Did 
the Queen pay you to write that last bit?)
THERE. PUT THAT ON YOUR SITE!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join the Constitutional Monarchy Association
Set up as a branch of the International Monarchist League
Supporting Monarchy in the UK under the chairmanship of the Rt. Hon. the
Lord Sudeley
£15 per year, e-mail Monarchy@BTInternet.com
TELEPHONE (UK) 0181 531 4616
WRITE (UK):
PO BOX 430, CHINGFORD, LONDON E4 9SQ
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
SO WE DID
A four pearl effort from Mr Ramsey...but a point off for misspelling the word "privy", though that might well be where he thought up this condescending waffle!!!
.
....The inimitable James again ...... James.T.Ramsay@BTInternet.com

Subject: Anti royalty domain funnier than your page


Oh, by the way, have you asked Daniel Cooke for the use of that photograph?

Would that be THIS photograph?????


.
Thanks Daniel, cheers mate.....can see why James is a bit sensitive about it though.

...
  ..... SO HAVE YOUR TWO CENTS WORTH HERE, AND YOU TOO,
  .....LIKE JAMES,CAN ENJOY YOUR 15 MINUTES OF FAME.....ALL POSTS WILL  .....BE DISPLAYED AND RESPONSES MADE...


.....WE CARE ENOUGH TO REPLY....:O)


Hi Jim...good to hear from you.
Please extend my heartfelt thanks to Daniel for THAT photo.
WHAT A RIPPER!!!
I have set up a responses page so you can have your day in the sun,
so please feel free to respond.
Regards, a colonial
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Never take a backward step and never fire till you see the whites of their eyes!!!!!


(I think the Brits said that to the Anzacs at Gallipoli
when they made them charge the Turks with bayonets
against machine guns whilst the Brits were taking tea on
the beach down the road a bit.....thank god for the
colonial cannon fodder eh?)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Dear Jim...well buy it from we colonial heretics and stop the intense surge
of humour issuing from https://members.tripod.com/~royaltysucks/index.html
Yes horrid though it is we own ROYALTYSUCKS.COM, containing, amongst other
blemishes in the good taste area, the best shot yet of Her Maj in a pillbox hat......grin....
probably contributed to the moral and cultural decline you so astutely noticed.....
Long live the memory of Diana, the only human and humane royal yet...
Charles get a hairpiece you wingnut....hey..a wingnut domain might be cool too.......


Regards,laughing irreverently all the way
all replies to Indigo@artlover.com



Try Link-O-Matic for instant hits!

PLEASE CLICK ON OUR SPONSORS LINKS AND BANNERS



Page design by Cyberartz Design. Click the image to visit.




This name proudly owned by The Domain Wizards


DOMAIN NAMES FOR SALE, FREE LISTINGS, SEARCH FACILITIES




LINKS! Search Without Prejudice!

Add Me!
Submit your page to 34 popular sites for free!



HOME